Project #3 - Final Project

Overview

The main portion of a student's grade in this course is the final group project. Students will organize into groups of three and choose to implement a project that is (1) relevant to the materials discussed in class, (2) requires a significant programming effort from all team members, and (3) unique (i.e., two groups may not choose the same project topic). The projects will vary in both scope and topic, but they must satisfy this criteria. We will discuss this more in depth during class, though students are encouraged to begin to think about projects that interest them early on. If a group is unable to come up with their own project idea, the instructor will provide suggestions on interesting topics.

Each project is comprised of four tasks that are due at different times during the semester:

At a high-level, each project consists of three implementation tasks. The first is the actual implementation of the proposed idea in the DBMS. The second is the set of unit and regression tests that they will use to check whether their implementation is correct. The final piece is the evaluation of their implementation to determine how will the DBMS performs with it.

Each group must use a single Github repository for all development.

  • Release Date: Mar 01, 2023
  • Due Date: May 01, 2023 @ 11:59pm

Proposal Presentation (Due Date: March 1st, 2023)

Each group will give a 5 minute presentation about their proposed project topic to the class. This proposal should contain the following information:

  • An overview of what work must be done and how it will be divided amongst the group.
  • A estimation on what files you will need to modify in the DBMS.
  • The tests that you will write to validate that your project is correct and the experiments that you will use to measure its performance.
  • The resources you will need to complete the project. This includes software, hardware, data sets, or workloads.

Your proposal should also provide three types of goals: 75% goals, 100% goals, and 125% goals. Think of these as the equivalent of a B grade, an A grade, and a "wow!" grade. The goals can be dependent or independent of the prior goals. Each group can meet individually with the instructor afterwards for additional discussion and clarification of the project idea.

Each group should email the instructor a PDF version of their proposal presentation before class.

Project Update Presentation (Due Date: April 5th, 2023)

Each group will provide a brief update to the class half way through the project on the the current status of their implementation. The update presentation should contain the following information:

  • An overview of the development status of their project as related to the goals discussed in the initial proposal.
  • Any information about whether the groups' original plans have changed and an explanation as to why.
  • A measurement of the current code coverage of the tests for your implementation.
  • Color commentary about any surprises or unexpected issues that the group encountered during coding.

The goal of this exercise is to make sure that everyone in the class is aware of what the other groups are working on and how far along they are in the process.

Project Design Document (Due Date: April 5th, 2023)

As part of the status update, each group must provide a design document that describes their project implementation. This document should contain the following information:

  • Overview: A description of the problem that you are trying to solve with your project. That is, what are the high-level goals of the code that you are adding to the DBMS.

  • Architectural Design: An in-depth overview of how you implemented your project. Explain the input and output of the component, describe interactions and breakdown the smaller components if any. You should also describe what (if any) configuration knobs your component will need.

  • Design Rationale: An explanation on why you chose the given design. Your justification should discuss issues related to (1) correctness, (2) performance, (3) engineering complexity / maintainability, and (4) testing. It should also include a brief discussion of the other implementations that you considered and why they were deemed inferior.

  • Testing Plan: A detailed description of how you are going to determine that your implementation is both (1) correct and (2) performant. You should describe the short unit tests and long running regression tests.

  • Trade-offs and Potential Problems: Describe any conscious trade-off you made in your implementation that could be problematic in the future, or any problems discovered during the design process that remain unaddressed (technical debts).

  • Future Work: List any future enhancements or optimizations to your project that you think are worth pursuing after the semester is over. You should provide a rough approximation of the difficulty in the implementation and the expected benefit in terms of either software engineering .

  • Glossary (Optional): List any new concepts or unintuitive/non-standard names that you have added to the system.

These design documents must be written Markdown using this template. This part of the project is meant to encourage each group to think through their implementation before they start making changes. They will also serve as guides for future students in helping them understand what you did after you have left CMU and are potentially dead.

Each group should maintain their design document throughout the semester because you will need to provide an updated version for each code review and the final submission.

Final Presentation (Due Date: May 5th, 2023)

During the scheduled final exam period for the course, each group will do 10 minute presentation on the final status of their project. This presentation should contain the following information:

  • A re-iteration of your proposed goals, with explicit discussion about what progress you have made to date on those goals
  • A discussion of how you tested the correctness of your implementation.
  • An assessment on the quality of your code. Feel free to discuss what parts of your implementation you felt are particularly strong and what parts would need more work to bring up to production-quality code.
  • Any benchmark results that the group collected to measure the performance of their implementation.
  • An outline of concrete tasks for future work to expand or improve your implementation.

Collaboration Policy

  • Everyone has to work in a team of three people for this assignment.
  • Groups are allowed to and strongly encouraged discuss the details about the project with others.

WARNING: All of the code for the core portion of your project must be your own. You may not copy source code from other sources that you find on the web. Plagiarism will not be tolerated. See CMU's Policy on Academic Integrity for additional information.